Bilingual Ballot Bill Languishes, But Community Power Keeps Growing
Aug 1, 2008
The Asian American community won unanimous passage of the Home Rule Petition to extend Chinese and Vietnamese bilingual ballots in May, but the state legislative session closes on July 31st with little chance of enacting the bill into law.
The community sought legislation, to extend Chinese and Vietnamese bilingual ballots beyond the December 2008 expiration date and to specifically authorize inclusion of Chinese names on the ballot, after Secretary of State William Galvin repeatedly refused to meet with Asian American leaders to discuss the issues.
Over the past year, nearly two thousand community members have written letters to city and state officials. Voters have engaged in a number of lobby days first at City Hall and then at the State House, and hundreds turned out for the City Council hearing in May and a civil rights speak-out at the State House in June. The Coalition for Asian American Voting Rights has involved more than 30 Asian American community organizations as well as advocacy groups like MassVOTE, the Massachusetts Immigrant and Refugee Advocacy Coalition, and the Jewish Alliance for Law and Social Action.
As the two-year legislative session began winding to a close, elderly Chinatown voters began two weeks of daily visits and four days of public vigil in front of the State House. This week, the bill was finally admitted to the House of Representatives, just two days before the July 31 close of the formal two-year legislative session, making it highly unlikely for the bill to be passed this year.
Since unanimous passage by the Boston City Council, every minor procedural step of the Home Rule Petition has moved at a snail’s pace, including two weeks for Mayor Menino to sign the bill, one week for it to be sent to the State House clerk’s office, three weeks to move from the clerk’s office to the House Committee on Rules, and nearly five weeks to be admitted to the House of Representatives. All of these steps are at such an early level of the process that the legislation may not even have a bill number by the close of the session.
What’s the hold-up?
While it might seem harmless to provide bilingual ballots to ensure equal voting rights for elderly Asian American voters, the voting rights legislation hit a wall of opposition from early on.
The primary opposition has come from Secretary of State William Galvin, who has publicly opposed inclusion of Chinese names on the ballot for the past year. While Galvin has stated that he opposes transliteration of candidate names because of the potential to confuse voters, he has refused numerous requests from Asian American voters and community leaders to discuss his concerns. Individual voter complaints, public information requests, and over 1600 letters sent to his office have gone completely unanswered. Yet Galvin has taken the time to speak to the media on several occasions, including a talk-radio appearance last May in which he complained that Asian American voters were demanding “special treatment.”
Although he is the highest ranking official in charge of elections in Massachusetts, Galvin was not a named party in the US Department of Justice’s voting rights lawsuit against the City of Boston in 2005, and he was not at the table when the ensuing agreement was negotiated to launch Chinese and Vietnamese bilingual ballots. Political observers point to this omission as the source of Galvin’s immovable opposition. Unfortunately, it is the Asian American community—which also was not at the table for the 2005 agreement—that suffers.
As the official in charge of certifying all candidates, managing the state’s voter lists, administering all elections, and registering all lobbyists, the Secretary of State may not have convinced many elected officials with his views, but his powers make many reluctant to cross him.
Voting in the Fall 2008 Elections
Without the passage of new legislation by July 31, Chinese and Vietnamese bilingual ballots will end entirely in December 2008. But, due to Galvin’s opposition to including candidate names in Chinese, this year’s ballots for September 16 and November 4 will exclude transliterated candidate names—i.e., everything will be translated but the most important part of the ballot!
As an alternative to a fully bilingual ballot, Galvin has promoted the use of the AutoMark machine at polling station, an expensive new machine, designed to assist the visually impaired, which can read an audio recording of the ballot contents in Chinese to the voter. But with Chinese names banned from the ballot, the AutoMark machine will read the candidate names in English only, and thus be of little help to Chinese-speakers. At the Secretary of State’s urging, Boston’s Election Department is setting up orientations to the AutoMark machine in Chinatown this week.
State Senator Dianne Wilkerson, who represents Chinatown, proposes that the state print fully bilingual Chinese/English sample ballots to be distributed to all Chinese-speaking voters in Boston if the bilingual ballot bill does not pass this year. If her proposal is successful, the sample ballots would be implemented in the September and November elections. Short of a fully bilingual ballot, the sample ballot would be a useful voting aid for Chinese-speaking voters. It would also beg the question of why the state can’t print a fully bilingual ballot.
To Be Continued?
In January 2009, a new two-year legislative session will begin, and the community will need to choose whether or not to continue the fight to extend bilingual ballots.
While Secretary Galvin’s opposition is unlikely to change, the Coalition for Asian American Voting Rights has several months to strategize in order to motivate other officials to play a stronger advocacy role. A second-year campaign would begin with a more educated pool of city and state officials.
In the last decade, Chinatown has moved from political invisibility to become one of Boston’s most politically active neighborhoods. The bilingual ballot agreement itself resulted from an increasingly active voter population and many individual elderly citizens who spoke up for their voting rights and called for bilingual ballots. With the City of Boston’s launch of fully bilingual ballots in 2007, Chinatown’s voter turnout rate surpassed the citywide average for the first time. The community has suffered a temporary setback by failing to protect the bilingual ballot before it expires this year, and by failing to defeat Galvin’s banning of Chinese names on the ballot.
But, even in the face of this setback, the Asian American community has made gains as well.
The breadth of community leaders and groups that came together and contributed to the campaign signal recent efforts to reach a new level of operational unity and political maturity within the community. Thousands of voters have participated in the past year’s voting rights campaign, and hundreds now know their way to City Hall and the State House. Asian American voters felt their power this spring when Boston City Council rapidly turned around from a neutral position into unanimous support for the bilingual ballot bill. With a public city council hearing in May, the community brought to bear impressive numbers, moving personal testimony, and a wealth of factual information. The rules of the game are different in the State House, however, where inaction is all that is needed to defeat an initiative.
We appear to have lost this round, but the struggle for voting rights and political clout continues. The community needs to build on the gains we have made to increase our ability to influence policy decisions, pass legislation, and hold our elected officials accountable to the community’s priorities.
The Coalition for Asian American Voting Rights will hold a series of evaluation and planning meetings over the next few weeks, and we would like to hear the opinions and feelings of community members. A discussion about the bilingual ballot legislation and the future of voting rights in Chinatown is scheduled for Wednesday, August 6, 6:30 pm at the Quincy School Cafeteria. For more information, call 617-357-4499 or 617-851-1701.
The Past Year’s Bilingual Ballot Timeline
June 2007: Asian American community leaders initiate several requests to meet with Secretary of State Galvin to discuss bilingual ballots and transliteration. Requests continue at intervals throughout the year, but all are either ignored or denied.
City Councilor Michael Flaherty sponsors a non-binding resolution, passed by Boston City Council, in support of transliteration of candidate names on the ballot.
Feb 7: Coalition members meet with Mayor Menino’s staff to share ideas for legislation and to request a Home Rule Petition extending bilingual ballots.
Feb 26: City Councilors Sam Yoon and Bill Linehan file a Home Rule Petition, then withdraw it for further review by the City’s corporation counsel.
March 12: City Councilors Sam Yoon, John Connolly, and Michael Ross file the Home Rule Petition, and are joined on the floor by Councilors Chuck Turner and Charles Yancey. Councilor Stephen Murphy requests first that the bilingual ballot bill be tabled, then that the city council hearing not be held until the end of April.
March: State Senator Dianne Wilkerson files a bilingual ballot local option bill as an attachment to the state budget, but this is later removed by the Senate leadership.
Apr 2: Community holds its own public meeting on the bilingual ballot and invites city councilors to hear voters’ testimony.
Apr 8: Asian American voters begin lobbying Boston state legislators for Election Day Registration and extension of Chinese and Vietnamese bilingual ballots.
May 5: Over 200 community members attend City Council hearing on the bilingual ballot. Councilors call it “one of the most moving and informative city council hearings” they have ever attended.
May 6: Coalition representatives meet with Speaker DiMasi, who pledges his support for the bill.
May 14: After lengthy discussion, the City Council votes unanimously in favor of the bilingual ballot Home Rule Petition.
May 28: Community holds Bilingual Ballot Lobby Day at the State House to begin educating state legislators about the issue. Mayor Menino signs the Home Rule Petition.
June 4: Home Rule Petition is brought to the State House and filed with the House Clerk’s office.
June 18: Home Rule Petition is sent to the House Committee on Rules.
June 23: Over 200 community members participate in a Civil Rights March and Speak-Out at the State House.
July 15: Chinatown voters begin daily visits to the State House for final two weeks of the legislative session.
July 29: Home Rule Petition is admitted to the House of Representatives.
The community sought legislation, to extend Chinese and Vietnamese bilingual ballots beyond the December 2008 expiration date and to specifically authorize inclusion of Chinese names on the ballot, after Secretary of State William Galvin repeatedly refused to meet with Asian American leaders to discuss the issues.
Over the past year, nearly two thousand community members have written letters to city and state officials. Voters have engaged in a number of lobby days first at City Hall and then at the State House, and hundreds turned out for the City Council hearing in May and a civil rights speak-out at the State House in June. The Coalition for Asian American Voting Rights has involved more than 30 Asian American community organizations as well as advocacy groups like MassVOTE, the Massachusetts Immigrant and Refugee Advocacy Coalition, and the Jewish Alliance for Law and Social Action.
As the two-year legislative session began winding to a close, elderly Chinatown voters began two weeks of daily visits and four days of public vigil in front of the State House. This week, the bill was finally admitted to the House of Representatives, just two days before the July 31 close of the formal two-year legislative session, making it highly unlikely for the bill to be passed this year.
Since unanimous passage by the Boston City Council, every minor procedural step of the Home Rule Petition has moved at a snail’s pace, including two weeks for Mayor Menino to sign the bill, one week for it to be sent to the State House clerk’s office, three weeks to move from the clerk’s office to the House Committee on Rules, and nearly five weeks to be admitted to the House of Representatives. All of these steps are at such an early level of the process that the legislation may not even have a bill number by the close of the session.
What’s the hold-up?
While it might seem harmless to provide bilingual ballots to ensure equal voting rights for elderly Asian American voters, the voting rights legislation hit a wall of opposition from early on.
The primary opposition has come from Secretary of State William Galvin, who has publicly opposed inclusion of Chinese names on the ballot for the past year. While Galvin has stated that he opposes transliteration of candidate names because of the potential to confuse voters, he has refused numerous requests from Asian American voters and community leaders to discuss his concerns. Individual voter complaints, public information requests, and over 1600 letters sent to his office have gone completely unanswered. Yet Galvin has taken the time to speak to the media on several occasions, including a talk-radio appearance last May in which he complained that Asian American voters were demanding “special treatment.”
Although he is the highest ranking official in charge of elections in Massachusetts, Galvin was not a named party in the US Department of Justice’s voting rights lawsuit against the City of Boston in 2005, and he was not at the table when the ensuing agreement was negotiated to launch Chinese and Vietnamese bilingual ballots. Political observers point to this omission as the source of Galvin’s immovable opposition. Unfortunately, it is the Asian American community—which also was not at the table for the 2005 agreement—that suffers.
As the official in charge of certifying all candidates, managing the state’s voter lists, administering all elections, and registering all lobbyists, the Secretary of State may not have convinced many elected officials with his views, but his powers make many reluctant to cross him.
Voting in the Fall 2008 Elections
Without the passage of new legislation by July 31, Chinese and Vietnamese bilingual ballots will end entirely in December 2008. But, due to Galvin’s opposition to including candidate names in Chinese, this year’s ballots for September 16 and November 4 will exclude transliterated candidate names—i.e., everything will be translated but the most important part of the ballot!
As an alternative to a fully bilingual ballot, Galvin has promoted the use of the AutoMark machine at polling station, an expensive new machine, designed to assist the visually impaired, which can read an audio recording of the ballot contents in Chinese to the voter. But with Chinese names banned from the ballot, the AutoMark machine will read the candidate names in English only, and thus be of little help to Chinese-speakers. At the Secretary of State’s urging, Boston’s Election Department is setting up orientations to the AutoMark machine in Chinatown this week.
State Senator Dianne Wilkerson, who represents Chinatown, proposes that the state print fully bilingual Chinese/English sample ballots to be distributed to all Chinese-speaking voters in Boston if the bilingual ballot bill does not pass this year. If her proposal is successful, the sample ballots would be implemented in the September and November elections. Short of a fully bilingual ballot, the sample ballot would be a useful voting aid for Chinese-speaking voters. It would also beg the question of why the state can’t print a fully bilingual ballot.
To Be Continued?
In January 2009, a new two-year legislative session will begin, and the community will need to choose whether or not to continue the fight to extend bilingual ballots.
While Secretary Galvin’s opposition is unlikely to change, the Coalition for Asian American Voting Rights has several months to strategize in order to motivate other officials to play a stronger advocacy role. A second-year campaign would begin with a more educated pool of city and state officials.
In the last decade, Chinatown has moved from political invisibility to become one of Boston’s most politically active neighborhoods. The bilingual ballot agreement itself resulted from an increasingly active voter population and many individual elderly citizens who spoke up for their voting rights and called for bilingual ballots. With the City of Boston’s launch of fully bilingual ballots in 2007, Chinatown’s voter turnout rate surpassed the citywide average for the first time. The community has suffered a temporary setback by failing to protect the bilingual ballot before it expires this year, and by failing to defeat Galvin’s banning of Chinese names on the ballot.
But, even in the face of this setback, the Asian American community has made gains as well.
The breadth of community leaders and groups that came together and contributed to the campaign signal recent efforts to reach a new level of operational unity and political maturity within the community. Thousands of voters have participated in the past year’s voting rights campaign, and hundreds now know their way to City Hall and the State House. Asian American voters felt their power this spring when Boston City Council rapidly turned around from a neutral position into unanimous support for the bilingual ballot bill. With a public city council hearing in May, the community brought to bear impressive numbers, moving personal testimony, and a wealth of factual information. The rules of the game are different in the State House, however, where inaction is all that is needed to defeat an initiative.
We appear to have lost this round, but the struggle for voting rights and political clout continues. The community needs to build on the gains we have made to increase our ability to influence policy decisions, pass legislation, and hold our elected officials accountable to the community’s priorities.
The Coalition for Asian American Voting Rights will hold a series of evaluation and planning meetings over the next few weeks, and we would like to hear the opinions and feelings of community members. A discussion about the bilingual ballot legislation and the future of voting rights in Chinatown is scheduled for Wednesday, August 6, 6:30 pm at the Quincy School Cafeteria. For more information, call 617-357-4499 or 617-851-1701.
The Past Year’s Bilingual Ballot Timeline
June 2007: Asian American community leaders initiate several requests to meet with Secretary of State Galvin to discuss bilingual ballots and transliteration. Requests continue at intervals throughout the year, but all are either ignored or denied.
City Councilor Michael Flaherty sponsors a non-binding resolution, passed by Boston City Council, in support of transliteration of candidate names on the ballot.
Feb 7: Coalition members meet with Mayor Menino’s staff to share ideas for legislation and to request a Home Rule Petition extending bilingual ballots.
Feb 26: City Councilors Sam Yoon and Bill Linehan file a Home Rule Petition, then withdraw it for further review by the City’s corporation counsel.
March 12: City Councilors Sam Yoon, John Connolly, and Michael Ross file the Home Rule Petition, and are joined on the floor by Councilors Chuck Turner and Charles Yancey. Councilor Stephen Murphy requests first that the bilingual ballot bill be tabled, then that the city council hearing not be held until the end of April.
March: State Senator Dianne Wilkerson files a bilingual ballot local option bill as an attachment to the state budget, but this is later removed by the Senate leadership.
Apr 2: Community holds its own public meeting on the bilingual ballot and invites city councilors to hear voters’ testimony.
Apr 8: Asian American voters begin lobbying Boston state legislators for Election Day Registration and extension of Chinese and Vietnamese bilingual ballots.
May 5: Over 200 community members attend City Council hearing on the bilingual ballot. Councilors call it “one of the most moving and informative city council hearings” they have ever attended.
May 6: Coalition representatives meet with Speaker DiMasi, who pledges his support for the bill.
May 14: After lengthy discussion, the City Council votes unanimously in favor of the bilingual ballot Home Rule Petition.
May 28: Community holds Bilingual Ballot Lobby Day at the State House to begin educating state legislators about the issue. Mayor Menino signs the Home Rule Petition.
June 4: Home Rule Petition is brought to the State House and filed with the House Clerk’s office.
June 18: Home Rule Petition is sent to the House Committee on Rules.
June 23: Over 200 community members participate in a Civil Rights March and Speak-Out at the State House.
July 15: Chinatown voters begin daily visits to the State House for final two weeks of the legislative session.
July 29: Home Rule Petition is admitted to the House of Representatives.
Article Reference: http://www.sampan.org/show_article.php?display=1556
copyright © 2010 Asian American Civic Association. All rights reserved.
